Summary of Reading 1C "Language Varieties and Standard
Language"
Kelly Wilson
Back to G301 homepage or G301 Schedule
In this reading, Randolph Quirk argues against a report published by a committee in England concerning the need for children to acquire standard English. The report basically states that the many different forms of English spoken throughout the world, kn
own also as 'liberation linguistics', are not to be accepted as a correct form of Standard English. Quirk believes that the teaching of Standard English is necessary in maintaining the function and value of true Standard English. He argues that through th
e processes of standardization, the base language of Standard English is being compromised. Quirk states that by settling for lower standards of English, these non-native speakers are limiting themselves in their future career paths.
Quirk's arguments bring up several valid issues. It must be decided as a whole how we are to treat English as a language. By allowing 'liberation linguistics', are we limiting those new to the language? By solely allowing Standard English as an acceptabl
e form of the language, are we in fact limiting those who have a firm grasp on their form of English? How does Ebonics factor into this argument? Are we discriminating against those who speak a form of English (i.e. Indian English) by demeaning their form
of the language? Do the forms of English (i.e. Indian English, Hong Kong English, Malaysian English, etc.) limit the users in their perspective career paths? Will the use of Standard English increase their opportunities in today's Standard English world
?