Thomas Tweed Course Syllabus
Prepared for the Center for the Study of Religion and American
Culture by:
Thomas Tweed
Department of Religious Studies
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
formerly of the University of Miami
The Center is pleased to share with you the syllabi for
introductory courses in American religion that were developed
in seminars led by Dr. Katherine Albanese of the University
of California, Santa Barbara. In all of the seminar discussions,
it was apparent that context, or the particular teaching
setting, was an altogether critical factor in envisioning
how students should be introduced to a field of study. The
justification of approach, included with each syllabus,
is thus germane to how you use the syllabus.
For the personal use of teachers. Not
for sale or redistribution.
© Center for the Study of Religion and American Culture,
1998
I. Syllabus Justification
THE INSTITUTIONAL SETTING
The University of Miami is a private school that enrolls
thirteen thousand students. The students are diverse in
terms of religion, region, race, ethnicity, and ability.
About half of the student population is Roman Catholic.
Twenty percent is Jewish. The same proportion is Protestant.
There is a small but significant Muslim population, and
some Hindus and Buddhists. In most classes I have at least
one student from the Caribbean or South America who has
been exposed to religions of African origin, such as Santería,
Vodou, or Winti. Half of the enrolled students live outside
Florida, and approximately 10% live beyond the borders of
the United States. The quality of the student body increased
dramatically during the 1980s. At that time the average
SAT scores jumped more than one hundred points, for instance.
But students still vary in preparation and ability. The
honors students are quite good. Some others still have significant
writing problems, sometimes although not always because
English is their second language.
I teach about religion in America in three contexts. First,
I deal with the subject for two weeks in our jointly taught
"Introduction to Religion" (Religion 101) . In
that course my goals, mostly, are to be clear and entertaining.
Approximately 350 students enroll in that course each semester.
Second, I teach a smaller core course that introduces students
to the subject in one semester (Religion 131). Both of those
courses are part of the core curriculum and fulfill distribution
requirements. (Some students take religion as the lesser
of two evils: philosophy is the other choice.) Finally,
I have taught a number of upper level offerings (300 and
400 level) in my four years at UM, including "The American
Encounter with Asian Religions," "Religion and
Literature in America," "Religion and Culture
in Victorian America," and "Religion in Japan
and America."
THE INTRODUCTORY COURSE
A few students in my introductory course on religion in
America (Rel 131) already have heard my six lectures in
Religion 101, but most have not. Therefore, I assume no
background. I limit the size of the class to twenty or,
at the most, twenty five. I teach it as a writing intensive
course. (Our students need to take six of these.) Every
other semester I offer it as an Honors course.
I have a number of aims for this course, many of which
usually go unspoken. For instance, I would like students
to be more tolerant, more imaginative, more excited by the
life of the mind. But I have three main goals. First, I
want to improve students' analytical skills. I want them
to be able to effectively analyze religious issues that
might arise in personal, local, or national affairs. Second,
I want to help students improve the clarity of their writing.
(I find that our students have a great deal of trouble formulating
and defending a thesis.) Finally, I want to emphasize pluralism--a
diversity of sources, methods, and topics. I talk about
the unifying forces in American religion too--e.g., civil
religion and Protestantism itself--but I want them to see
the variety of American religion and the variety of methods
for studying it. The journals and class discussions, then,
explore different ways of investigating religion and different
forms of religiousness. The papers, on the other hand, are
meant to encourage students to go deeper into one topic,
to use one approach. I put a great deal of emphasis on the
papers, and allow a wide range of approaches and topics.
Some do field work. Some interpret material culture or film
or fiction. Many consider more traditional sources such
as books, articles, or sermons.
The course has changed each of the seven times I have taught
it. Three changes have been most significant. First, it
began as a lecture course. Now I rarely speak for more than
the first fifteen minutes: I say only enough to orient students.
I hand out an outline for each class, and place the readings
in a wider context. But I emphasize discussion, and to facilitate
conversation I request a seminar room with one large table.
Second, I have eliminated objective tests because they seemed
incompatible with my primary goals. If student evaluations
are any indication, the results have been positive. Students
report a sense of relief and freedom. They now can read
to analyze ideas rather than memorize facts. Finally, the
course also began as a historical survey. I used a chronological
approach. Even then I emphasized pluralism in many ways,
but, most fundamentally, I told a story about the contest
for public power that emphasized race, gender, class, and
ethnicity. This year I decided to change to a thematic format.
I did so for several reasons. The most important was that
I found that our students, at least at the 100 level, were
uninterested in the past. So, they couldn't wait until we
got into the late nineteenth century. And they loved the
twentieth. I went to a thematic approach in order to find
another way of including the past. I try to sneak it in.
In this approach, they read, f or instance, John Winthrop
and Billy Graham on the same day. I have found that this
works very well for my students. A second reason that I
changed to a thematic format was to place less emphasis
on the story about white, male, Protestant public power.
That story is still there: for instance, I tell it in sessions
two through six. But there is less emphasis on it. In other
words, I think that the thematic approach leaves more room
for other stories to emerge. At least that is my hope. Finally,
the thematic approach allows me to highlight diversity of
sources, methods, groups, and issues.
The journals, focus reading, and papers seem to work well;
and the emphasis on discussion has been successful too.
But I still am not entirely satisfied with the course. I
worry, first of all, that there is too much diversity. Yet
it is surprising, at least to me, that few students complain
about that (perhaps one in a class of twenty). In general
I feel more comfortable now that I have eliminated objective
testing since there seems to be greater compatibility between
course goals and testing methods, but at times I wonder
if I am failing to meet other professional obligations.
Is there some historical information that we should demand
that all students know? Or is it sufficient to aim to excite
students and improve their analytical skills? Finally, I
also worry that by hiding the past I am losing it. Have
I given in? Or is this a good way to keep student interest
so that they can learn something?
II. Course Syllabus
Religious Studies 131
Thomas A. Tweed
(Writing Intensive) University of Miami
Religion in American Life
COURSE DESCRIPTION:
This course provides an introduction to the history, themes,
and issues in American religion from the pre-colonial period
to the present. It is divided into three sections. The first
provides an historical overview and an introduction to some
of the religions that have been most prominent--Catholicism,
Protestant, and Judaism--as well the traditions that are
native to the land. The second and third sections consider
some "non-traditional" religions (those outside
orthodox Judaism and Christianity). Those sects and religions
include, for instance, Mormons, Shakers, Zen Buddhists,
and Black Muslims. We also explore in those last two sections
of the course a wide range of topics. Most of them concern
the relation between religion and some other theme or dimension
of American life--politics, art, science, literature, music,
race, gender, class, and popular culture. This is a writing
intensive class.
PREREQUISITES:
None. No prior knowledge of Religious Studies or American
religious history is assumed.
PROCEDURES:
This class emphasizes discussion. I will lecture for the
first three class sessions. For all other sessions, I will
offer "mini-lectures" of fifteen minutes or less.
Those "mini-lectures" are summarized in the one-page
outlines I distribute at the start of each class. I also
will provide other handouts and show slides and films to
help orient students. But most of our time together will
be spent discussing the issues raised by the assigned reading.
To guide your preparation for class I offer a "study
question" and list a "focus reading" for
each meeting. Everyone should look at the focus reading
(usually twelve pages or less) before class and be prepared
to discuss it. As I indicate below, we also will rely on
students' journal entries to encourage careful analysis
and stimulate informed conversation.
GRADING:
Because I am most interested in helping students to refine
their ability to read critically, argue persuasively, and
interpret imaginatively (and not "spew facts"),
there will be no objective quizzes or exams. I will test
understanding of the material in other ways. Grading will
be based on the following:
- JOURNAL: In the journal, the student records her/his
responses to one of the assigned readings for each class
session. The entry is to be written before you come to
class so that your out-of-class writing can help focus
and sustain our discussion. Bring the journal to class
every day. Some days I will collect the entries. I also
will review each student's journal regularly (perhaps
three times during the semester). What should these journals
look like? The length of the entries might vary. Some
might be two short paragraphs: some might be two pages.
A good length might be approximately one page. For each
entry, first, list the topic and the pages of the passage
at the top of the page (e.g., "William James on Faith":
Gaustad 2:313-16). Then summarize the specific idea you
are responding to or provide a brief quotation from the
text. Finally, offer some sustained response to that one
idea in the assigned text. The completed journal is due
at the start of the last class session.
- PAPERS: Students also will write two papers of 4-3
pages. Some extra research will be required on almost
all topics. See me before you begin your research so that
I can help direct you to relevant sources. *All students
must show me a written thesis paragraph no later than
one week before the paper is due. (Please note: I will
not grade your paper if I have not seen a thesis paragraph
in advance.) I will distribute a long list of suggested
essay topics approximately two weeks before the paper
is due, but students are not confined to those topics.
You should begin thinking about your first paper topic
immediately. You might use your journal to help locate
and refine your interests. If you are worried about the
papers, relax. I will offer printed guidelines to writing
essays in Religious Studies. Also, I am happy to read
as many thesis paragraphs, paper outlines, or first drafts
as you submit. (But please allow me enough time to read
and return your work.)
- INFORMED PARTICIPATION: Finally, consistent, informed
participation in class discussions is valued highly, and
it will constitute 15% of the student's final grade. It
is not simply the quantity of talk that counts. I will
calculate students' tentative class participation grades
at the half-way point so that each can know where she
or he stands. Attendance obviously is important: you cannot
participate if you are not in class.
*SUMMARY OF THE GRADING:
Journal: 35%; Paper I: 25%; Paper II: 25%; Class Participation:
15%.
BOOKS TO PURCHASE:
The following books can be purchased in the bookstore:
- Mary F. Bednarowski, American Religion (Englewood Cliffs,
N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1984).
- Edwin S. Gaustad, ed., A Documentary History of Religion
in America, 2 vols., (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1992, 1983).
Reserve Readings: Selected readings will be on reserve
in the library and in the Religious Studies Department Office.
KEY REFERENCE WORKS TO CONSULT FOR YOUR PAPERS:
- Henry Bowden, Dictionary of American Religious Biography
(1977). (Contains one-page biographies of key figures
in American religion.)
- Mircea Eliade, ed., The Encyclopedia of Religion, 16
vols. (1987). (Contains brief articles about various topics--e.g.,
ritual or art--and groups--e.g., Black Muslims or Buddhists.)
- Charles Lippy and Peter Williams, ed., The Encyclopedia
of American Religious Experience ( 1998). (Articles on
topics and groups in American religious history .)
- J. Gordon Melton, The Encyclopedia of American Religions,
2nd ed. 1986). (A good guide to non-traditional religiousness
in the contemporary U.S., including cults, the occult,
and Asian religions.)
- The Religion Index. (A guide to articles in scholarly
journals in religion, indexed by subject as well as author.
Volumes are arranged by year.)
CLASS SCHEDULE AND ASSIGNMENTS:
1 . Introduction to the Class
2. Themes, Definitions, and Issues: Religion in American
Life
Reading: Bednarowski 1-14,160-165.
Study Questions: What is religion? What are the sources
of diversity in American religion? What, if anything, unifies
Americans religiously? How has religion shaped and been
shaped by other dimensions of American life?
3. Historical Overview
Reading: Bednarowski 15-28.
Study Questions: How has American religion changed over
time? Are there any continuities? Which group(s) have exerted
the most public power? How have the dominant group(s) shaped
and been shaped by others? How have the groups with less
public power dealt with those that have wielded more?
I. TRADITIONAL RELIGIOUS GROUPS
4. Native American Religions
Reading: 1) Gaustad 1: 10-11, 16, 19. (Native Americans)
2) "Seminole Folktales" Florida Historical Quarterly
(Apr. 1978):477-80, 485-86, 492-94. 3) Gaustad 1: 63-64
(Letter to Ponce de Leon), 64-65 (Las Casas), 67-68 (Menéndez),
68-70 (Indian Revolt off Georgia's coast).
Focus: Gaustad 1: 10-11, 63-64, 67-70. "Florida History"
in "Seminole Folktales."
Study Questions: What was the source and extent of the
conflict between Native Americans and Spanish colonists?
How did each understand (and misunderstand) the other?
5. Protestantism in America
Reading: 1) Gaustad 1: 96-97 (Virginia), 101-107 (Puritan
New England). Gaustad 2: 512-516 (Billy Graham), 539-544
(Evangelicals in media and politics). 2) Bednarowski, 29-37
(on revivalism), 48-33 (on J. Edwards). 3) Selection from
J. Edwards, "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God."
Focus: *Gaustad 1: 104-107 (Winthrop). Gaustad 2: 539-44.
*Selection from "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God."
Study Questions: What, if anything, unites these different
Protestant voices? How does the Protestant emphasis on personal
experience change and stay the same?
6. Video: "Born Again"
Reading: Review the reading on Protestant Evangelicals
from last class session (Gaustad 2: 539-44).
Study Questions: Why were the members of this Protestant
group attracted to it? How does this movement fit into the
history of American Protestantism? What does it tell us,
if anything, about America (or at least Massachusetts) during
this period?
7. Roman Catholicism in America
Reading: 1) Bednarowski, 110-115 (Fulton Sheen). 2) Gaustad
1: 459-66 (Anti-Catholicism and Nativism). Gaustad 2: 46-49
(Strong and Gibbons), 271-276 (a Catholic for President
in 1928); 516-518 (Fulton Sheen's Peace of Soul); 502-507
(The first Catholic President--Kennedy); 468-71 (Vatican
II opening). 475-79 ("Declaration on Religious Liberty").
FOCUS: Gaustad 1: 459-66 (anti-Catholicism). Gaustad 2:
46-49 (Strong and Gibbons), 475-76 ("Liberty").
Study Questions: Is Catholicism incompatible with democracy
and American culture, as some nativists claimed? How did
Catholicism change after Vatican II?
8. Jews, Judaisms, and American Culture
Reading: 1) Bednarowski, 101-105 (Isaac Wise). 2) Gaustad
1: 86 (Protestant views of Jews, 1655). Gaustad 2: 54-60
(Three forms of American Judaism), 400-404 (Principles of
Reform Judaism, 1885 and 1937); 440-442 (Emil Fackenheim
on Auschwitz); 442-449 (Zionism and the State of Israel)
FOCUS: Gaustad 2: 54-60, 440-442, 443-445, 448-449.
Study Questions: How has Judaism been shaped by the American
context? How did American Judaism change after World War
II?
II. NON-TRADITIONAL GROUPS
9. New Religious Movements in the 19th Century: Mormonism,
Spiritualism, and Christian Science
Reading: 1) Bednarowski, 65-68 (on dissenting groups),
71-74 (Christian Science). 2) Gaustad 1: 349-360 (Joseph
Smith and Mormonism), 376-381 (Spiritualism). Gaustad 2:
243-47 (Mary Baker Eddy and Christian Science).
Focus: Gaustad 1: *349-352, 357-59, 376-379. Gaustad 2:
243-47.
Study Questions: How and why were these new movements founded?
What do they share with the more established religions and
the dominant culture?
10. New Religious Movements: Conversion and "Cults"
in 20th Century America
Reading: Robert Ellwood and Harry Partin, Religious and
Spiritual Groups in Modern America, 266-88 (on new religious
movements and their leaders and converts). 258-265 (Unification
Church), 297-301 (Jones and The People's Temple).
Focus: Ellwood and Partin, 268-274 (theories of conversion),
287-88 (how new religions succeed), 262-265 (Unification
Church's basic theological document), 301 (Jones' last speech).
Study Questions: Why have people joined new religious movements,
especially these two? What factors are most important in
determining the "success" or "failure"
of new movements?
11. Asian Religions in America: Buddhism
Reading: 1) Gaustad 2: 237-39 (Madame Blavatsky and the
Theosophical Society, 1889). 2) Marie de Souza Canavarro,
"How I Came to Buddhism," Insight into-the Far
East (1933). 3) Ellwood and Partin, 230-35 (Zen in America).
4) Gaustad 2: 531-534 (Watts and Snyder on Zen). 5) E. Allen
Richardson, East Comes West (1985): 71-85 (on Japanese Buddhists
in U.S.)
Focus: Canavarro. Ellwood and Partin, 230-35. Richardson,
East Comes West, 71-78.
Study Questions: What were the sources of Buddhism's attractiveness
for American converts? How did Japanese Pure Land Buddhists
deal with the often hostile American cultural context?
Video in Class: "The Simpsons" (Portions of a
1990 episode in which Homer and his neighbor wager on a
miniature golf game between their sons).
12. Asian Religions in America: Hinduism and Islam
Reading: 1) Surinder M. Bhardwaj, "Hindu Dieties and
Pilgrimage in the United States," in Geographia Religionum
vol. 5 (1990): 211-27. 2) Ellwood and Partin, 201-207 ("Hare
Krishna's"). 3) E. Allen Richardson, East Comes West,
137-42, 150-58,171-78 (on Muslims in North America).
Focus: Bhardwaj (concentrate on the account of the Sri
Venkateswara, Temple in Pittsburgh). Richardson, 171-78.
Study Questions: How have these immigrants, especially
since 1965, accepted and resisted American religious and
cultural patterns? How will Islam and Hinduism change the
American cultural landscape?
Film in Class: "Consecration of a Temple" (1979)
13. FIRST PAPER DUE
III. TOPICS AND ISSUES
14. Religion and the State: Church-State Separation and
Civil Religion
Reading: 1) Gaustad 2: 528-30 (Gaustad on church-state
issues), 49-54 (Jews and the Bible in schools: Minor v.
Board of Education in 1869), 554-57 (peyote and the Native
American Church). 2) Christian Science and Healing (Twitchel
case, article in Miami Herald). 3) Santeria and Sacrifice
in Hilaleah (article in Miami Herald). 4) Catherine Albanese,
America: Religions and Religion, 295-309 (on civil religion).
5) Inaugural addresses of presidents (Jefferson and Bush).
Focus: Gaustad 2: 554-57. Christian Science case. Bush's
Inaugural Address.
Study Questions: Are there limits to religious freedom
in the U.S.? Is there a civil religion, and if so is it
compatible with the official policy of separation of church
and state?
15. Religion and Sexuality
Reading: 1) Gaustad 1: 345-49 (Oneida Perfectionists),
369--71 (Shakers). 2) Stories of Trickster Figures (Sam
Gill, Native American Traditions 32-33). 3) Gaustad 2: 581-85
(Debate on Abortion).
Focus: All assigned readings.
Study Question: How have religious beliefs and values shaped
attitudes about sexuality in these four cases?
Slides in Class.
16. Religion and Locality: Cuban-American Religion and
the Landscape of Contemporary Miami
Reading: 1) Diana González Kirby and Sara Maria
Sánchez, "Santeria: From Africa to Miami Via
Cuba, Five Hundred Years of Worship," Teguesta 48 (1988):
36-48. 2) James R. Curtis, "Miami's Little Havana:
Yard Shrines, Cult Religion, and Landscape," Journal
of Cultural Geography 1.1 (Fall/Winter 1980): 1-15.3) Selection
from Thomas A. Tweed, "Our Lady of the Exile: Nationalism,
Identity, and Devotion at a Cuban American Shrine in Miami"
(forthcoming). 4) Gaustad 2: 551-54 (Cubans).
Focus: Curtis. "Yard Shrines." Tweed, "Our
Lady of the Exile."
Study Questions: How has exile changed the religion of
Cubans? How has the presence of Cubans changed the cultural
landscape of Miami since 1959?
Slides in Class.
17. Religion and Material Culture: Painting, Architecture,
and Home Furnishings
Reading: 1) John Dillenberger, The Visual Arts and Christianity
in America 71-79. 2) Colleen McDannell, The Christian Home
in Victorian America, 1840-1900, 38-45. 3) The Crystal Cathedral
Album, 1-2, 7, 13-14 (on Robert Schuller and the Crystal
Cathedral)
RECOMMENDED: Bednarowski, 78-86.
Focus: McDannell, 38-45. (This has illustrations. Text
is limited.) Crystal Cathedral Album.
Study Questions: How do religious beliefs and values influence
attitudes about the nature and significance of artifacts?
How has religion shaped painting, religious architecture,
and domestic furnishing?
Slides in Class.
18. Religion and Literature
Reading: 1) Harriet Beecher Stowe, Uncle Tom's Cabin, chp.
7 ("The Mother's Struggle), chp. 40 ("The Martyr"),
chp. 45 ("Concluding Remarks"). 2) Flannery O'Connor,
"A Good Man is Hard to Find," in Three by Flannery
O'Connor, 129-43. RECOMMENDED: Bednarowski, 86-90 (on Flannery
O'Connor).
Focus: Stove, chp. 40. O'Connor, "A Good Man is Hard
to Find"
Study Questions: How does Stowe's novel reflect mid-Victorian
Northern Protestant attitudes about social reform, personal
development, civil religion, motherhood, femininity, race,
and art? What literary techniques does Stowe use to communicate
her message and is she successful? In what sense and to
what degree is "A Good Man" a "Catholic"
short story? Which character, if any, is the vehicle of
grace or redemption? Who, if anyone, is the recipient?
19. Religion and Music
Reading: Selection from The Bay Psalm Book in The Puritans,
ed. Perry Miller and Thomas H. Johnson, 2: 555-60. African
American Spirituals ("Sometimes I Feel Like a Motherless
Child," "Go Down Moses," "Steal Away
to Jesus") and "Battle-Hymn of the Republic,"
(1861) by Julia Ward Howe in America in Literature, ed.
David Levin and Theodore L. Gross, 1843-45, 1805. Andrew
M. Greeley, "The Catholic Imagination of Bruce Springsteen,"
in Sacred Music of the Secular City, Special issue of Black
Sacred Music 6 (Spring 1992):232-43. John Cage, "Foreword"
and "Experimental Music: Doctrine," in Silence
(1961), ix-xi, 13-18. RECOMMENDED: Edwin M. Good, "The
Bible and American Music," in The Bible and American
Arts and Letters, ed. Giles Gunn, 129-54.
Focus: African American Spirituals. John Cage. Greeley
on Springsteen.
Study Question: How have religious beliefs and values shaped
these musical compositions? What function does music have
in the religious life of these groups and individuals?
Musical recordings in class: "What a Friend We Have
in Jesus" (1868); "I Never Did Believe" (early
Shaker spiritual): Bruce Springsteen, "Valentine's
Day" from Tunnel of Love.
20. Religion and Science: Darwinism
Reading: 1) Bednarowski, 38-46. 2) Gaustad 2: 327-29 (Draper),
331-34 (Talmage), 340-41 (McCosh), 342-45 (H.W. Beecher),
347-55 (The Scopes Trial). Look again at Gaustad 2: 543-44
(on Creationism in late-twentieth century).
Focus: Gaustad 2: 327-29, 340-41, 348-55.
Study Questions: To what extent is traditional theistic
faith compatible with the claims of science, specifically
Darwinism? What have been the most important intellectual
problems raised by Darwinism?
21. Religion and Philosophy: The Ethics of Belief Debate
Reading: 1) William K. Clifford, "The Ethics of Belief,"
(1877) in The Ethics of Belief Debate, 19-24, 36. 2) Gaustad
2: 313-16 (William James on the right to believe). (The
assigned reading is brief so that you can read and evaluate
the arguments fully and carefully.)
Focus: Clifford and James.
Study Questions: Do we have a moral obligation to believe
only that for which we have, in Clifford's words, "sufficient
evidence?" What is "sufficient evidence?"
What is faith? Is it under voluntary control? Is it cognitive
or non-cognitive--in other words, more like scientific or
poetic language?
22. Religion and Race: African American Religions, 1619-1865
Reading: 1) Gaustad 1: 253-54 (Phillis Wheatley), 467-70
(Henry Bibb and William Thomson on slave religion); 488-91
(Samuel How, defender of slavery), 477-80 (E. Lovejoy, critic
of slavery), 472-75 (Frederick Douglass).
Focus: All readings, especially Wheatley and Douglass.
Study Questions: How did religion function to support and
alleviate social injustice before the Civil War? How was
it a conserving force? How was it a transforming force?
23. Religion and Race: African American Religions, 1865-Present
Reading: 1) Bednarowski, 57-61 (Martin Luther King, Jr.),
74-77 (Black Muslims). 2) Gaustad 2: 266-71 (the KKK in
the 1920s), 493-97 (Martin Luther King), 545-46 (James Cone),
547-49 (Malcom X). 4) Ellwood and Partin, Religious and
Spiritual Groups, 292-97 (Black Muslims),
Focus: Gaustad 2: 493-97, 545-49. Ellwood and Partin,"Black
Muslims."
Study Questions: How has African American religion functioned
to support and alleviate injustice since the Civil War?
Which themes or patterns continue from the earlier period?
24. Religion and Gender
Reading: 1) Bednarowski, 154-159.2) Gaustad 1: 132-38 (Anne
Hutchison, Mary Dyer, Witches), 503-507 (Grimké sisters).
Gaustad 2:61-65 (Anoinette Brown Blackwell and an opponent
on women's right to preach), 69-71 (Stanton's The Woman's
Bible), 3) Selection from Mary Daly, Beyond God the Father
(1973).
Focus: Gaustad 1: 503-507. Gaustad 2: 69-71. Daly, Beyond
God the Father.
Study Questions: How has religion shaped personal attitudes
and social roles? What role, if any, did attitudes about
women play in the treatment of Anne Hutchison, Mary Dyer,
and the witches? How has religion supported the oppression
of women? Has it been, or can it be, a liberating force?
25. Religion, Social Problems, and Economic Status
Reading: Bednarowski, 61-64 ( on Dorothy Day). Gaustad
1: 401-402 (The "Voluntary Principle"), Gaustad
2:65-67 (WCTU), 117-119 (Gibbons), 123-124 (Reform Jews
on Social Problems, 1928),125-27 (Rauschenbusch), 280-82
(Dorothy Day), 251-52 (Conwell, "Acres of Diamonds"),
283-284
(R. Niebuhr).
Focus: Gaustad 1: 401-402. Gaustad 2: 125-27, *280-82,
*251-52.
Study Questions: How should religions deal with social
and economic inequality? Do Judaism and Christianity compel
their adherents to work to alleviate social problems or
is religion primarily a personal matter? Is it our religious
obligation to be either poor or rich?
26. Quasi-Religions in Contemporary America: Alcoholics
Anonymous, American Atheists, Elvis Presley, and the Super
Bowl
Reading: 1) Joseph L. Price, "The Super Bowl as Religious
Festival," Christian Century 101 (Feb. 22, 1984): 190-91.
2) James Combs, "Celebrations: Rituals of Popular Veneration,"
Journal of Popular Culture 22 (Sept. 1989):71-77. 3) The
"Twelve Steps" of Alcoholic's Anonymous. 4) "Atheism
is Here to Stay Says Madalyn O'Hair," Democrat and
Chronicle [Rochester, NY], 19 June 1988.
Focus: Price, "Super Bowl." The Twelve Steps.
Combs, "Celebrations".
Study Questions: We return to the question with which we
began: What is religion? In what way and to what extent
are these groups, places, and rituals "religious?"
|