
Dr. Melbourne S. Cummings,
Howard University
In Her Own Words:
Melbourne Cummings
Talks about NCA, her Career,
& Mentoring
Professor Cummings is the
2008 Francine Merritt Award recipient for outstanding contributions
to the lives of women in communication. Below, Voices shares her
remarks from an electronic interview conducted after she learned she
won the award.
First NCA
experience
My first NCA meeting was in
1973. I was anxious to get into my role as a college professor of
speech communications: attending national meetings, presenting
papers, publishing articles, etc.
I had finished my Ph.D. the
year before but chose to go with my husband to spend a year in Kenya
where he did his research on the Akamba people of East Africa (and I
had the chance to learn more deeply about my own cultural heritage).
Before earning my Ph.D. in
communications, I previously had been an instructor of English in
two small colleges, but I had never been given the opportunity to do
anything else but teach.
So I was completely lost at
my first SCA conference the first day. I went to sessions that
seemed interesting, but I saw no one of color, initially, and not a
single white person spoke to me or smiled in my direction. I was
rather shy, maybe even a bit intimidated, so I spoke to no one,
either.
At breakfast the next
morning, I met my dissertation advisor from UCLA, Molefi Asante,
who, of course, greeted me and invited me to a meeting that
afternoon. I went, and there I met, in addition to Molefi, other
people who have become my dear friends: Jack Daniel, Lyndrey Niles,
Orlando Taylor, Caroline Calloway Thomas, Dorothy Pennington, the
late Lucia Hawthorne, and others.
Origins of the
Black Caucus
This 1973 meeting was a
gathering of disenfranchised black people who were poised to change
the face and attitude of the Speech Communication Association of
America forever. I learned that they had begun to meet together in
1969 after some of them were called racial slurs and actually
physically threatened. It was at this 1973 meeting that we began a
loosely organized caucus to ensure that our research always would be
presented in appropriate forums.
We decided on a newsletter to
get the word out about our existence, inviting people to do panel
presentations on their research at conferences (local, regional, and
national). I became the newsletter editor.
We used a Black College
Speech and Drama organization as one of our springboards. Lucia
Hawthorne of Morgan State invited us to meet at their conference,
and for those of us who had never made presentations at national
meetings, this venue was perfect to get our feet wet. The audience
was critical, but supportive, friendly, and encouraging.
Over the years, as I have
attended our meetings, I have seen the Black Caucus grow
exponentially. I have come to know many people, and I have formed
many good solid relationships across the membership of NCA. I have
developed genuine friendships among some of my colleagues.
NCA Today
My most recent NCA meeting
was last year (2007). I mentioned that at my first meeting I went a
full day without seeing one black person or speaking to even one
white person. Now the number of our black members has grown large
enough to have not only a caucus but also a division.
I see people here now whom I
have known for half my life. Where we once had to call colleagues
across the United States to ask if they would write papers on
certain topics to present at the meetings, we now have the luxury of
having so many submissions that papers and panels are selected
competitively.
Where initially I knew no
one, with the exception of my advisor and long-time friend, I now
cannot count the number of people I know in our discipline.
Where no white person dared
speak to me at my first conference, I now have solid relationships
with most of the members of the Black Caucus and with people from
other areas of the membership, including Anita Taylor, Jim Chesebro,
Don Boileau, Sherry Morreale, and Sandra Herndon, among many others.
We go out of our way to find each other at the conferences or make
prior arrangements to see each other.
NCA looks and feels a lot
different in 2008 than it did in 1973.
Proud
Professional Moments
It is very difficult to
decide on a “proudest professional moment.” I’ve tried to think of
how I felt when my first Ph.D. student successfully completed her
dissertation, but the same feeling comes over me each time one of
our students finishes.
I even thought of when I
received the association’s Kibler Award or the association’s Mentor
Award, but I know how deeply touched and honored I am when one of my
students, after an especially insightful learning moment, pens a
note of thanks to me.
In thinking about this
“proudest moment” question, I asked a friend and Black Caucus
colleague who happened to be visiting me this summer about how to
respond. Dr. Debbie Atwater, who served on the Legislative Council
when I was the Director of Affirmative Action for the association,
said that for her it was the time I had to address the Council on
how we assessed the progress of the Speech Communication Association
in its treatment of “affected groups”: African Americans,
Lesbians/Gays/Bisexuals, and Women. It was after the meeting when I
was put on the spot because I had told the Council about its racist
practices toward the black members of the organization. One very
brave and outspoken (white) member dared to ask if I were saying
that NCA had openly practiced racism toward its black members, and I
answered, “Yes” and went on to give examples.
This immediately resulted in
being asked to find two “qualified” candidates that the Council
could choose between to run for vice president. The caveat was that
I had one hour to select them and get their approvals and
curriculum vitae to the Council before it reconvened.
This resulted in Carolyn
Calloway Thomas being our first black nominee for vice president.
She did not win, but she had an excellently run campaign.
For me, this example was a bitter/sweet moment, for it proved that
even among our intellectual and social peers we still had to “prove”
our worth, our ability, and our qualifications to serve in our own
discipline’s organization.
I was happy that I had an impact, but for me, it was not a “proud
moment in my professional career.”
Since that time, Orlando Taylor of Howard University served as
president of the organization.
What I do remember most about that time was that the Affirmative
Action Council, especially Anita Taylor, physically went with me and
stood in support.
My answer to the question about my proudest professional moment has
to be that I have been blessed to have many proud moments, and among
them are the times that I see my students leave the university with
their Ph.D. degrees in hand, ready to conquer a waiting academic
life.
Relations between the Black Caucus & the Women’s Caucus
The Black Caucus and Women’s
Caucus actually started out supporting each other. Even though our
foci were different, we had similar issues dealing with
discrimination and lack of recognition.
Initially, as we officially
formed our caucuses (the Black Caucus was formed first), we
supported each other by adding our names to each other’s rosters to
make sure we had the appropriate numbers to achieve our goals.
As we both began our unique
ways of conducting research, tensions grew from definitions,
theories, and methods.
Though there was never a real
coalition, there was also never a true separation. Each caucus had a
few active members/researchers who were part of both groups.
I certainly think we benefit
from working more with each other than continuing to think in
separatist ways. I think discussions on the differences and
similarities in the theories of feminism and Womanism can only
instruct and help us grow in understanding who and what each of us
values.
Cooperative exchange of ideas
always enhances who we are as people and as educators, and we
should, of course, work toward reducing any tensions that exist in
our disciplines and in our lives.
We’ve had a few joint panels
over the years. I think it would be a good idea to make concerted
efforts to revive our interactions for our mutual benefit.
Important Influences
on
Teaching & Scholarship
Off the top of my head, I
would say the colleagues who have most influenced my teaching and
scholarship are my late husband Robert J. Cummings as well as Molefi
Asante, Jack Daniel, Judi Moore Latta, Alice Walker, and Bernice
Reagan.
Students include Brenda
Allen, Ronald Jackson, Felicia Walker, Sharnine Herbert, Rachel
Droogsma, and Cerise Glenn, along with so many others, each because
of her or his unique ways of discovering how and what we
communicate.
About Mentoring
I come from very humble
Southern beginnings where to survive everyone was responsible for
someone else. I know no other way to live but by helping others
reach their full potential.
As a child, all my role
models were teachers. What I liked about those in my life who were
not teachers by profession was what and how they taught me.
I never wanted to be anything
other than a college professor. I chose that profession early on
because I discovered that I was only interested in teaching those
who were genuinely interested in learning.
What I noticed about people
in my hometown is that when people showed potential to succeed, they
were nurtured in such a way that they always succeeded. In most
instances, when they set their sights on what to do with their
lives, then the community seemed to come together to make it a
reality.
People in my church, school,
and community raised funds to help me go to contests, exhibitions,
etc. They encouraged and helped me in everything I did. I was
mentored throughout my childhood and young adulthood. I came to
mentoring naturally.
I do what my small community
did for me and for countless others. I know no other way to conduct
myself than to help a student, female or male, to reach her or his
potential.
I am proud to say that most
of the graduate students who enter our program at Howard University
graduate. Mentoring has a lot to do with it. Mentoring, I think,
has to do with consistency, with being available to students, with
encouraging them, with offering support, with showing interest and
concern in not only their academic lives but also their personal
lives. We must support students academically, financially, and
personally. Though they are adults, sometimes they feel vulnerable
and need someone to listen to them, to allow them to vent, to cry,
to help them work through frustrations.
They need us to expect the
best from them and tell them when they’re falling short, as well as
when they are excelling. We need to recommend them for awards when
they deserve it and refuse to do so when they do not, always letting
them know, however, why they don’t qualify and what they must do to
begin to measure up.
Winning the
Merritt Award
When I heard that my former
student Brenda Allen nominated me, I was very pleasantly surprised
and felt extremely privileged and honored!
I think of Brenda more as a
colleague than a former student, since it has been more than 20
years since she graduated. Even when she was a student, she was
teaching us how to use the computer, efficiently and effectively.
She was a staff member on our campus in the Learning Center and was
an extremely bright young woman. We all wanted Brenda to get a
Ph.D., and I certainly did what I could to make it happen. She has
turned out to be all that we thought she would be and more. I am so
proud of her.
I am also grateful to have
been supported for such a prestigious award by my students Cerise
Glenn and Rachel Droogsma (whose groundbreaking research on women
you will hear about very soon) as well as my colleagues Carolyn
Byerly and Anita Taylor. I thank all of them for this singular
honor.
Melbourne S. Cummings
July 2008
Contact the Web Spinner