Syllabus: B384
(subject to change)
European
Intellectual History II: Fall 2005
“The Long
Revolution of the Enlightenment: Hegel to Foucault”
Section 25135
MW
Professor
Kevin Cramer Cavanaugh
503M
317-278-7744
Mon/Weds:
kcramer@iupui.edu and
by appointment
Required
Texts
1. Jan Goldstein and John W.
Boyer, eds.,
2. John W. Boyer and Jan
Goldstein, eds.,
3. Robin W. Winks and Joan
Neuberger,
4. Robin W. Winks and R.J.Q.
Adams,
Course
Description
The
intellectual history of the industrialized West has at its core the enduring
conflict of modernity: the clash between the Enlightenment and its critics.
This course examines this two-hundred year old conflict from the perspective of
a wide variety of thinkers, from Hegel to Marx, through Weber and Freud, to
Sartre, Arendt, and Foucault. On the
assumption that ideas motivate men, this course is designed as a history of
those ideas that have had the most profound impact on social, political, and
economic organization in the West. It begins with the bright promise of early
nineteenth century liberalism to emancipate the individual, continues through
socialism's attack on the failure to deliver on that promise, the
disillusionment with the claims of reason following World War I,
totalitarianism's promise to liberate the individual from the obligations of
freedom, and concludes with the re-assessment of the Enlightenment's legacy
following the cataclysm of World War II. This course will hopefully help us
come to a better understanding of the major problem of our age, as defined by
one of the thinkers we will study: "The contradiction between an apparently
contented society and a deep current of discontent emerging mainly in
irrational and ugly ways is our immediate and inescapable challenge."
Course
Objectives
The
aim of this course is to go beyond an introduction to the most influential
ideas of our time to delve more deeply into these ideas in a seminar format
based on lively discussion and debate, textual analysis, and written argument.
The course is also designed to provide you with further practice in the skills
required by the university's "Principles of Undergraduate Learning” (for
details and further information on the PUL go to www.iupui.edu/~history/principlesundergradlearning.htm).
Lectures and exams will introduce you to facts, concepts, themes, and terms
that will allow you to understand the importance of this period while giving
you the historical context for a better understanding of how your society and
world works. The writing assignments, based on readings of primary sources,
will enable you to develop your reflective, critical, and analytical abilities.
In-class participation and discussion will enable you to sharpen your
communication skills as well as your capability to efficiently and spontaneously
summarize, categorize, interpret, and evaluate information. This part of the
course also allows you to make a vital and necessary contribution to how topics
and issues are brought into focus in each class. Lectures
and exams will introduce you to facts, concepts, themes, and terms that will
allow you to explain and contextualize the importance of these ideas while
applying this knowledge to a better understanding of how your society and world
works. The writing assignments, based on close readings of the texts, will
enable you to develop your reflective, critical, and analytical abilities. As
this course is a seminar, in-class participation and discussion will push you
to sharpen your communication skills as well as your capability to efficiently
and spontaneously summarize, categorize, interpret, and evaluate information.
This aspect of the course also allows you to make a vital and necessary
contribution to how topics and issues are brought into focus in each class.
Course
Requirements
1. Exam 1: 20%
2. Exam
3. Take Home Final Exam: 30%
4. Participation: 15%
5. Response Papers: 15%
Grading
System
This
course will use the standard 100-point grade scale. .
Course
Policies
Make
up exams will only be offered in cases of documented dire emergency. As
participation in seminar discussions is part of your final grade, attendance is
important. As a matter of good faith, please keep me informed as far in advance
as possible of circumstances that will force you to miss class. Lecture
outlines, writing assignments, exam reviews, and other important information
and course material will be posted on Oncourse, so check it regularly. An A-range grade evaluates work that goes substantially
beyond the formal outlines of the assignment by showing marked originality,
creativity, and strength of argument, organization, and conception. A B-range
grade evaluates work that fulfills the assignment with noticeable, but not
thorough, attention paid to these ideas. Such work might also include flawed
reasoning and organization as well as stylistic problems (sentence structure,
spelling, vocabulary, use of scholarly conventions, etc.). A C-range grade evaluates work of genuine
effort that largely fulfills the assignment but displays substantial weaknesses
in several of the above areas. D-range work is evaluated as meeting the bare
minimums of the assignment in a perfunctory fashion. Obviously, an F grade
indicates complete failure to fulfill the assignment. You are graded and evaluated according to my evaluation and judgment of
your participation in class, your willingness to ask questions (there are no stupid questions), the quality of
your preparation for, and fulfillment of, assignments, and your willingness to
risk thinking analytically and originally. You are not graded for
"effort" and merely showing up each day. If you are having
problems fulfilling the requirements of the course contact me sooner rather
than later. Jennifer Thompson in the Student Advocate Office is also available
when you need help finding information or dealing with issues that affect your
attendance and academic performance. The Student Advocate’s office is in UC
2002. Ms. Thompson can also be reached at 278-7594 and via email at stuadvoc@iupui.edu. The Student Advocate
website can be found at http://www.life.edu/advocate.
Academic
Misconduct
Plagiarism is usually defined as the
deliberate theft of someone else's work and passing it off as your own. But
inattention, ignorance of scholarly citation conventions, and sloppy note
taking can also be construed as plagiarism, even if it is unintentional. Cutting and pasting from web-based sources
is plagiarism. The penalty for plagiarism is an automatic failing grade for the
course. Please consult the IUPUI
Campus Bulletin for further guidelines and information on plagiarism and
other forms of academic misconduct. For details and further information, also
see “Code of Student Rights, Responsibilities, and Conduct at www.jaguars.iupui.edu/handbook/2002/academicmisconduct.html.
Administrative
Withdrawal
A
basic requirement of this course is that you will actively engage with your
peers and instructor during class and conscientiously prepare for and complete
all assignments. If you miss more than half our class meetings within the first
four weeks of the semester without contacting me, you will be administratively
withdrawn from the class. Our class meets twice per week; thus if you miss more
than four classes in the first four weeks, you may be withdrawn, which will
make room for students on the waitlist. Administrative withdrawal may have
academic, financial, and financial aid implications. Administrative withdrawal
will take place after the full refund period, and if you are administratively
withdrawn from the course you will not be eligible for a tuition refund.
Class
Schedule
I.
The Nineteenth Century:
Reason and Revolution
Week One
1. Introduction (W 8/24):
"Goals, Objectives, Syllabus"
Week Two
2. Lecture 1 (M 8/29):
"Enlightened Social Engineering: Liberalism and Socialism"
3. Seminar 1 (W 8/31): G.W.F.
Hegel
Monday, September 5: No
Class (Labor Day)
Wednesday, September 7: No
Class (instructor at conference)
Week Three
4. Seminar 2 (M 9/12): J.S.
Mill
5. Seminar 3 (W 9/14): Alexis
de Tocqueville
Week Four
6. Seminar 4 (M 9/19: Karl Marx
7. Seminar 5 (W 9/21):
Friedrich Schleiermacher and Ludwig Feuerbach
Week Five
8. Seminar 6 (M 9/26): Ernest
Renan
9. Seminar 7 ((W 9/28):
Friedrich Nietzsche
Week Six
10. Lecture 2 (M 10/3):
"Whither Progress?"
11. Seminar 8 (W 10/5): Karl
Marx and Friedrich Engels
Exam 1 Format and Review
Guide posted on Oncourse
Week Seven
12. Seminar 9 (M 10/10): Eduard
Bernstein and Rosa Luxemburg.
13. Exam 1 Review (W 10/12)
II.
The Twentieth Century:
Ideology and Violence
Week Eight
14. Exam 1 (M 10/17)
15. Seminar 10 (W 10/19)): The
Futurists and Friedrich von Bernhardi.
Week Nine
16. Seminar 11 (M 10/24): Max
Weber and Sigmund Freud
17. Seminar 12 (W 10/26): Rudolf
Hilferding and Walther Rathenau
Readings: Max Weber, “Between Two
Laws” (Readings, vol. 9, 151-155) and Sigmund Freud, “Thoughts for the
times on War and Death” (Readings, vol. 9, 155-175); Rudolf Hilferding, "A
Co-Partnership of Classes?" (
Week Ten
18. Lecture 3 (M 10/31):
"Totalitarianism: The Flight from Freedom"
19. Seminar 13 (W 11/2): Adolf
Hitler and Benito Mussolini
Week Eleven
20. Seminar 14 (M 11/7): Joseph
Stalin
21. Seminar 15 (W 11/9): Antonio
Gramsci, Julien Benda, Arthur Koestler
Exam 2 Format and Review
Guide Posted on Oncourse
Week Twelve
22. Seminar 16 (M 11/14):
Friedrich von Hayek
23. Exam 2 Review (W 11/16)
Week Thirteen
24. Exam 2 (M 11/21))
Thanksgiving Recess (no
class): 11/23-11/27
Week Fourteen
25. Lecture 4 (M 11/28):
"Failure of the Enlightenment Project?"
26. Seminar 17 (W 11/30):
Jean-Paul Sartre
Week Fifteen
27. Seminar 18 (M 12/5): Hannah
Arendt
28. Seminar 19 (W 12/7): Michel
Foucault and Raymond Williams.
Take Home Final Exam Format
and Review Guide Posted on Oncourse
Week Sixteen
29. Final Exam Review (M 12/12)
Take-home Final Exam due at