Dr.
Libby
A346
American
Diplomatic
History:
1890-1945.
Office................UL4115J
Office
Phone..........274-3981
History
Office........CA-504M
History
Department....274-3811
e-mail:
jhlibby@iupui.edu
The
study of One's nation's
history
makes one a better
and
moral loyal citizen.
(Voltaire)
The
trouble of the world is
not
that people so little,
but
that they know so many
things
that ain't so.
(Mark
Twain)
History
is the witness of truth.
The
Life of Memory.
The
Teacher of LIfe.
The
Messenger of Antiquity.
(Cicero)
Wisdom
is the Principal Thing
Therefore
Get Wisdom
(Plato)
But
perhaps the study of history
has
been hindered by the following
truth:
This
course is designed to introduce the student to the broad spectrum of American
diplomatic history from the presidency of Theodore Roosevelt to the formal
signing of the peace treaty between the United States and Japan on April 28,
1952.
The
course provides the student with perhaps his or her first introduction to
historical research, writing a sizeable paper, footnoting and concluding his or
her study with a Bibliographical Essay.
The essence of these technical aspects of the paper will be explained
more fully in class.
Textbook:
Walter
LaFeber, The American Age: U.S.
Foreign Policy at Home and Abroad Since 1750.
Examinations:
There
will be a MID-TERM and a FINAL EXAMINATION. All of my examinations are essay in
form...I do not ask fill-in-the-blank questions...choose the right
answer...etc., you will need to write and to write well. You will have plenty of notice before
the examinations are given.
The
student is expected to answer completely, comprehensively and in a clear
fashion. If you have not had
experience in writing essay examinations it would be prudent to visit the
Writing Center on the fourth floor for assistance. I will discuss further details in
class.
PLEASE
READ CAREFULLY:
Attendance
in my classes is now mandatory and a seating chart will be provided. Students not attending the class or
having a continuous absence will have their names reported to the Registar's
Office as now required by the university.
I
ask students not to record my lectures; this is a private conversation
between you and me and since lectures were recorded years ago and sold to
students, I adopted this procedure.
If
you are hearing impaired or, in any other way cannot take lecture notes without
a tape recorder (for example because English is not your native language),
please visit the Office of Adaptive Educational Services in CA-001C and have
them contact me.
If
you need to call that office the phone number is:
274-3241
or 274-3242.
Indiana
University has a policy regarding cheating and plagarism. I ask you not to do either as no one
wins.
If
a student plans on leaving the course I would recommend that you withdraw
officially by visiting the Registrar's Office.
Do
not assume that I know you left the course because you have chosen to no longer
attend the class.
Many
students find out much later that they are not officially withdrawn from the
class and there is no way I can be of assistance.
Should
you call my office I have an answering machine which records the time and date
of the call...for some reason students will speak clearly when talking to such
machines but then give their phone numbers too rapidly for the mechanism to
record.
Please
speak precisely so the machine can pick up your whole messsage.
If
you have never had a good experience in a history course (presuming you were
taught by an historian) I would recommend staying current with your reading in
the textbook and the Chronology to avoid that sense of being overwhelmed
and frustrated by the course's requirements.
There
is no daily nor weekly reading assignment.
By the time you have arrived at the college-university level educational
process, you should be able to make such judgements for
yourself.
The
textbook is a supplement to my lecture but it cannot serve as a substitute for
learning the material required for the course.
The
grade of incomplete is rarely given, usually for deaths in the family or
hospitalization. Please do not rely
on the possibility of an incomplete to save you if you have not completed the
work.
If
you have any questions regarding the grade of incomplete please see Dean Miriam
Langsam in CA-401. Her phone number
is 274-3976.
I
encourage students to ask questions in class so do not be embarrassed. If the question is an honest inquiry
then there is no reason not to clear up any confusing aspects of the course or
its content.
The
main information you will need for the examinations will come from my
lectures...the Chronology will give you an overall panorama of the
information contained in our course and the textbook is a supplement.
If
you have not had any experience in writing essay examinations I suggest you
visit the Writing Center (CA-427) on the fourth floor for
assistance. Do check for the
center's semester hours.
The
dates of the examinations and the paper will be updated as needed on the
web-site and will also be announced in class.
The
Midterm Examination will cover:
Chapters
7-10, pages: 193-333.
The
Final Examination will cover:
Chapters
11-13, pages 334-456
You
are quite free, however, to read beyond page 456 but the final examination will
not cover any materials beyond the surrender of Germany and Japan in the spring
and summer of 1945.
For
the period 1945-forward, I would suggest the modern history course offered by
Professors Monroe Little and Annie Coleman.
Office
Hours:
MONDAY-TUESDAY-THURSDAY.....
10:00 A.M.-Noon
MONDAY-TUESDAY-THURSDAY.......4:00-5:30
P.M.
AND
BY APPOINTMENT
If
you have any questions about what has been written above, be sure to see
me.
Written
Paper:
The
student will choose one of the topics listed below and write a 20-30 page
paper.
YOU
HAVE AMPLE TIME TO COMPLETE THE
ASSIGNMENT
DURING THE SEMESTER SO
PLEASE
START EARLY AND
END ON TIME.
The
essay will be typed, double spaced, but beyond the format the student should
exhibit enterprising research (no encyclopedias...dictionaries...etc.), a
thorough analysis of the topic, person or treaty chosen, in addition to
revealing an understanding of the topic chosen.
If
you begin researching your topic immediately at the beginning of the semester
the time frame will not be a burden;
however,
if you wait to research and write the paper until the week before the essay is
due to be turned in, then, of course, you have created an unnecessary burden
upon yourself which could have been avoided with proper time
allotment.
More
about the paper will be said in class.
The
paper constitutes 40 percent of the class grade while the two
examinations total 60 percent of your grade.
Topics:
Because
of the number of students in the diplomatic class it would be impossible if not
futile to list all the topics so the subjects noted below are just samples of
what students may choose for their topics.
I
do ask all students to check with
me
and to let me mark their topics on
my
syllabus.
1. The Era of Expansionism
beginning in 1890 and terminating
with the acquisition of Puerto Rico,
Guam
and the Philippine Archipelago in the Treaty
of
Paris, December 10, 1898.
This
is a very broad topic and the student might consider researching and writing on
any subject within that time frame.
***BE
SURE TO SEE ME FIRST BEFORE EMBARKING ON ANY
OF
THE VARIOUS TOPICS DURING THIS TIME PERIOD.
2. Theodore
Roosevelt:
A. The concept he had of the
balance of power in European affairs, his reaction to the
new
imperialism
motivating European nations to seek
new
empires in Africa, the eastern end of the
Mediterranean,
in Southeast, Northeast, and Eastern
Asia, as well as what today we call the Pacific Rim.
B. Caribbean intervention
including his Colombian-Panamanian policies, the Corollary to the Monroe
Doctrine and his ideas of receiverships.
C. Asian issues and negotiations
following the American acquisition of an insular empire throughout the Pacific
basin. You will need to define
Roosevelt's concept of American diplomatic and military policies and strength
combined with his growing suspicions and fears of Imperial Meiji
Japan.
D. American acquisition of an
empire and its consequences. Here
the student will research and reflect upon the Supreme Court "Insular Cases"
that allowed the United States to gain an insular empire and the Congressional
legislation written and passed (sponsors of these proposals) that enabled the
United States to govern these newly won possessions.
The student will also need to address the controversies surrounding the
acquisitions as defined and argued by expansionists and anti-expansionists and
know the exact difference between their philosophies.
BE
CAREFUL: THEIR PHILOSOPHIES
NEED
CAREFUL EVALUATION.
3.
The presidency of William Howard Taft..choose one
of
the three major issues of his administration:
A. The issues in Asia, especially the
Taft-Knox Neutralization Scheme regarding railroads in Manchuria as well as
other issues relating to
Eastern
Asia in general and Japan specifically.
B. His policies revolving around
Dollar Diplomacy in Central and South America.
C. Whichever topic relating to
President Taft that you choose be sure to explain his later conflicts with
Theodore Roosevelt which were so important in electing Thomas Woodrow Wilson to
the White House in 1912.
4. Woodrow Wilson's
Diplomacy:
A. Pre-World War I diplomacy and
the futility of neutrality, 1914-1917.
The student will need
to
explain Wilson's decision to ask Congress for
a
declaration of war in April, 1917.
B. Once the United States was in
the First World War
what
were Wilson's objectives, how did he hope to
implement
them and then evaluate how well he
achieved his goals by explaining the issues he faced during the Treaty of
Versailles and League of Nations negotiations.
Finally,
discuss and explain the provisions of the treaty and League as well as the
treaty's strengths and weaknesses as commented upon by
historians.
C.
Explain Wilson's relationship with the Senate
before we entered the war, during the conflict and
during the crucial advice and consent ratification
debates.
***ANY
STUDENT CHOOSING ONE OF THE WILSON TOPICS
SHOULD BE VERY EXPERIENCED IN RESEARCH, HAVE A FIRM
KNOWLEDGE OF THE LIBRARY AND BE WILLING TO READ
MANY OF THE BOOKS AND ARTICLES RELATING TO THESE
TOPICS AND KNOW ALSO HOW TO WRITE EVALUATIVE
PAPERS.
5. Republican Foreign Policy:
1921-1933.
A. Washington Conference,
1921-1922...explain the four treaties and their impact on our government's
diplomatic and military policies during the decade.
B. Reaction to the Chinese Revolution,
1925-1928.
C. The origins, diplomacy and
consequences of the Kellogg-Briand Pact...The 'Outlawry of War'
concept.
D. The Manchurian Crisis,
1931-1933...the Hoover-Stimson Non-Recognition Policy...the onset and
continuation of the depression and the continuing issues in
China.
6. The Diplomacy of Franklin
Roosevelt:
The
diplomacy of the four-term president is so vast that it cannot be conveyed in
the handout. I would, however,
divide the issues into four time frames:
A. The diplomacy of the early
New Deal...the Italian-Ethiopian War of 1935, Hitler's invasion of the
demilitarized Rhineland in 1936, the problems relating to neutrality legislation
from 1934 to 1937, and the Spanish-Civil War, 1936-1939.
B. Reaction to the Second
Sino-Japanese War beginning on July 7, 1937 at the Marco Polo Bridge (also known
as the Marco Polo Bridge Incident) and its consequences through June 1940.
Be
sure to include in this topic the bombing and sinking of the U.S.S. Panay
on December 12, 1937, the attempt to revise the Neutrality Legislation and how
Roosevelt viewed Chiang Kai-shek and China in America's East Asian policy
formulation.
C. American-Japanese relations,
1933-1937. Here the student should
begin with relations following Japan's withdrawal from the League of Nations,
her withdrawal from the Washington Conference Naval Treaty obligations and the
announcement of a future New Order in Asia that foreshadowed antagonisms in the
next several years.
There
are other issues but those mentioned here are required for understanding the
growing hostility between Tokyo and Washington.
D. For the years 1937-1941,
relations with Japan continued to deteriorate and the student will need to explain the final collapse of
diplomatic cordiality between the two nations resulting in the Japanese
strategic military blunder of attacking Pearl Harbor on that "date
(NOT DAY) that will live in infamy".
****THERE
ARE TOO MANY ASPECTS TO AMERICAN-JAPANESE
RELATIONS BETWEEN 1937 AND THE ATTACK AT PEARL HARBOR TO LIST HERE. THUS, ANY STUDENT DESIRING TO WORK ON
TOPIC NUMBER D SHOULD SEE ME DURING REGULAR OFFICE
HOUR.
E.
Any student who wishes to write about the historiography of the Pearl
Harbor disaster and the charges of dereliction of duty that arose from the
attack should see me for assistance with this massive topic.
The
Bibliography that was passed out in class should be helpful. PLEASE USE IT;
DO NOT IGNORE IT.
7. Some students might wish to
pursue the Cold War topics centering on American relations with the
Soviet Union. A wide reading is
required for this topic so do not attempt it without making that
commitment.
8. Other possible
topics:
A.
Overview of American-Chinese Relations...1911-1949
B.
Overview of American-Soviet Relations....1933-1950
C.
Overview of American-Japanese Relations..1900-1919
D.
Overview of American-Japanese Relations..1920-1940.
E.
Overview of relations with European-Asian-Latin American countries not
mentioned above. Since Africa was
not of primary interest to American policy makers until the last thirty years,
policies formulated for Saharan and
sub-Saharan Africa were officially
presented through the various foreign offices of governments with
colonial interests on that
continent.
I
encourage students to research and write papers relating to the newly forming
republics in the post World War II era on any continent but diplomatic sources
might be insufficient in English.
The
student is also encouraged to study a Secretary of State within the many
administrations since the turn of the twentieth century. Among the more notable heads of the
State Department include:
For
Benjamin Harrison....James G. Blaine............1889-1892
John W.
Foster.............1891-1893
For
Grover Cleveland.....Walter Q. Gresham..........1893-1895
Richard
Olney..............1895-1897
For
William McKinley.....John Sherman...............1897-1898
William R.
Day.............1898
John
Hay...................1898-1901
For
Theodore Roosevelt...John Hay...................1901-1905
Elihu B.
Root..............1905-1909
Robert
Bacon...............1909
For
William Howard Taft..Philander C. Knox..........1909-1913
For
Woodrow Wilson.......William Jennings Bryan.....1913-1915
Robert
Lansing.............1915-1920
Bainbridge
Colby...........1920-1921
For
Warren Harding.......Charles Evans Hughes.......1921-1923
For
Calvin Coolidge......Charles Evans Hughes.......1923-1925
Frank B.
Kellogg...........1925-1928
For
Herbert Hoover.......Henry L. Stimson...........1929-1933
For
Franklin Roosevelt...Cordell Hull...............1933-1944
Edward R. Stettinius,
Jr...1944-1945
For
Harry Truman.........Edward R. Stettinius, Jr...1945
James F.
Byrnes............1945-1947
George C.
Marshall.........1947-1949
Dean G.
Acheson............1949-1953
For
Dwight Eisenhower....John Foster Dulles.........1953-1959
Christian A.
Herter........1959-1961
For
John Kennedy.........Dean Rusk..................1961-1963
Lyndon
Johnson...........Dean Rusk..................1963-1969
For
Richard Nixon........William P. Rogers..........1969-1973
Henry A.
Kissinger.........1973-1974
For
Gerald Ford..........Henry A. Kissinger.........1974-1977
For
Jimmy Carter.........Cyrus R. Vance.............1977-1980
Edmund
Muskie..............1980-1981
For
Ronald Reagan........Alexander M. Haig..........1981-1982
George P.
Schultz..........1982-1989
For
George Bush..........James A. Baker III.........1989-1992
Lawrence
Eagleburger.......1992-1993
For
Bill Clinton.........Warren M. Christopher......1993-1997
Madeline
Albright..........1997-
You
would have to use contemporary accounts found in newspapers, magazines, and the
most recently published scholarly textbooks and journals.
*****BE
CAREFUL: SOME OF THE SECRETARIES OF
STATE WHO DID NOT SERVE LONG TERMS MIGHT BE DIFFICULT TO STUDY
FOR MATERIALS MAY BE LACKING THAT WOULD PREVENT A DISTINGUISHED
AND SCHOLARLY PAPER. SEE ME
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT ANY TOPIC AND SECRETARY OF
STATE.
To
begin your research be sure to consult the Bibliographies in the textbook by
LaFeber as well as the sources listed below.
From
the sources listed below you have a beginning to
inaugurate
your historical-detective research regarding
your
topic.
Do
not ignore these sources but do not rely upon them as your only source
materials.
Samuel
Flagg Bemis and Robert Ferrell, eds.,
The
American Secretaries of State
series in multiple volumes.
Richard
Dean Burns, ed.,
Guide
to Ameican Foreign Relations, Since 1700
Frank
Merli and Theodore Wilson,
Makers
of American
Diplomacy (2 volumes).
Norman
Graebner, ed.,
An
Uncertain Tradition: American Secretaries
of
State in the Twentieth Century
I
have always found it curious that even after listing these sources, students do
not utilize them nor cite them in their papers.
IN
ADDITION, BE SURE TO CONSULT THE REFERENCE
LIBRARIANS AT IUPUI, THE MARION COUNTY MAIN LIBRARY ON MERIDIAN STREET, THE
STATE OF INDIANA LIBRARY AT OHIO AND SENATE STREETS AND IF POSSIBLE THE INDIANA
UNIVERSITY LIBRARY IN BLOOMINGTON.
I
WOULD SUGGEST VISITING OUR REFERENCE SECTION FOR ASSISTANCE
INITIALLY.
The
grade for the paper is determined not only by the content but by the
quality of the sources you have used.
If
you plan on just using an encyclopedia or copying from one source (or finding it
on the web-site) perhaps we should part as friends and on good terms for that
indifference to my course will not suffice but belongs in another level of your
education that hopefully you passed out of years ago.
To
be a good historian one must be a good detective and to do well in my class all
of these elements go into determining your grade. SEE ME IF THERE IS ANY
CONFUSION.
Please
Read Carefully:
Some
students have a tendency to write short, choppy and very uninteresting
sentences. Try to combine thoughts
into a sentence by using a comma, a coordinating conjunction and letting the
style flow.
Somewhere
in the background of students some teacher taught you to write such sentences or
did not correct your tendency to do so but it produces a poorly written
essay.
One
of the hints I have given students over the years is to read the paper aloud to
someone who does not know anything about your topic. If that person understands your essay
then you are fulfilling the objective of the assignment.
You
and the listener should also hear the short sentence structure as you read and
can make corrections at that moment.
It
does take time and effort.
When
quoting always identify whom the speaker is...for example:
Premier
Hara Kei commented:
Admiral
Yamamoto Isroku said:
AND
SO FORTH
ALWAYS
GIVE THE FULL NAME OF A PERSONALITY WHEN FIRST INTRODUCING HIM OR HER TO THE
READER.
IN
JAPANESE HISTORY, MANY MEN AND WOMEN MIGHT HAVE THE SAME NAME.....WHICH IS TRUE
FOR ALL NATIONS.....................
SO
BE SURE TO IDENTIFY WHICH PERSON YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT IF A PERSON WITH THAT
NAME APPEARS IN THE TEXT.
IN
ADDITION, DO NOT JUST DROP IN LONG QUOTES WITHOUT A SPEAKER BEING
IDENTIFIED.
IN
FACT, ONLY USE LONG QUOTES WHEN ABSOLUTELY
NECESSARY.
IT
IS BETTER TO PARAPHRASE IN YOUR OWN WORDS.
ANY
QUOTE OVER THREE LINES IN DURATION IS TO BE:
CENTE