Seminar in U.S. History
“Gender in U.S. History”
History H750 - Section C425 (4 credits)
Spring 2001, Wednesdays, 5:45p.m. - 8:25p.m.
Cavanaugh Hall 537
Instructor: Dr.
Nancy M. Robertson
Office: Cavanaugh
Hall 504N
Office Hours: Tuesdays,
1pm to 2pm
Wednesdays, 4pm to 5pm, or by
appt.
phone/voice mail:
317/274-8017
e-mail address:
nmrobert@iupui.edu
Course
Description:
This course is an advanced
research seminar for students in the History M.A. program. The readings for the course will focus on
the topic of gender in American history, as well as aspects of being a
historian and guidelines for historical research and writing. The common reading is intended both to
present students with a background on the topic of gender as an analytical
category, but also to give students a chance to evaluate other scholars’ work
(their thesis, the persuasiveness of their argument, their use of sources,
etc.). The reading will not, however,
provide a comprehensive history of gender (or of women or of men) in the United
States. Rather, four critical “moments”
in American history have been selected in order to reveal some of the
consequences of considering gender when doing history.
Students will develop, research,
and write an original work utilizing both primary and secondary materials. In addition, as part of being historians,
students will exchange work with classmates for peer review.
Although there will be some
lecture to provide background, classes will primarily be discussion. Students should come prepared to talk about
the issues raised by the readings, their own research and writing, and their
understanding of their colleagues’ projects (and lectures, when applicable).
Two expectations of students in
the class are worth emphasizing:
1. Attendance (prompt) is mandatory.
2. All papers (and written responses) will be distributed on time.
Because the class is a seminar,
class participation forms a significant portion of the final grade. To state the obvious, it is hard to
participate when one is not there. IF
it is absolutely necessary to miss a session, the student must notify the
instructor in advance. A written
assignment will be required of the student to cover the missed session.
Tardy submission of written work
inconveniences your classmates as well as the instructor and should not happen.
Course
Objectives:
The primary goal is for each
student to complete an article-length essay in publishable (or near
publishable) form and quality. The
paper may be on any topic or period in American history. The paper should include some consideration
of gender issues, although they do not have to form the primary core of the
thesis or argument. The sustained research project produced by each student
will demonstrate his or her ability:
to
select an historical topic, identify its significance, and make a plan of
research for that topic;
to
identify and locate primary sources concerning the topic chosen;
to
identify significant secondary literature regarding that topic, and trace the
historiography of that topic;
the
ability to critique the historiography and identify a perspective to prove or
disprove;
to
present a thesis, based on research in both secondary and primary literature
and sources;
to
defend that thesis and make a clear and cogent argument in its defense;
to
follow standard guidelines for format, citation, and other formal mechanics.
In addition, the
peer paper critiques, will demonstrate the student’s ability:
to constructively assist colleagues in improving their work
Books:
The following books can be
purchased at the bookstore in Cavanaugh or at Follett’s.
Required:
Kate L. Turabian, A Manual for Writers of Term Papers, Theses, and
Dissertations, 6th edition (Chicago: University of Chicago
Press, 1996). You may find earlier
editions provide sufficient instruction; they will, however, make it harder to
understand references by number rather than topic [see page 6 below].
Note: if you plan to do extensive scholarly writing or editing in the
future, you may want to consider purchasing a copy of the Chicago Manual of
Style, now in its 14th edition (1993). Turabian’s manual ought to get you through your masters.
Strongly Recommended:
William Strunk, Jr. and E.B. White [yes, the author of Charlotte’s
Web], The Elements of Style, 3rd edition [or later].
Optional:
Anne Lamott, Bird by Bird: some instructions on writing and life
(New York: Anchor, 1994).
I strongly recommend
having a recent U.S. history textbook readily at hand; they may be boring to
read, but they are excellent reference tools.
Articles:
Articles will be available
either on JSTOR or in CA537. When
possible, the CA537 articles will also be on the EROL system. When using CA537 copies, please make
personal copies and return the originals as soon as possible so that others may
do the same. There will be a sign out
sheet so please note when you take (and return) the piece.
Other Resources:
I will try to arrange for copies
of the A Guide to the Preparation of Theses and Dissertations
(Indianapolis: Research and University Graduate School, 2000). You should have a copy of the latest edition
(8/00).
You should check H-NET
(Humanities and Social Science Online) for listservs of possible use. H-Grad is intended for graduate students and
often has useful practical advice about being a grad student. The subject area lists range widely in list
culture, but almost all welcome (or are amenable to) graduate students joining. We can talk more about “netiquette” in
class. I do not want joining a listserv
(or multiple ones) to become a distraction from your work, but they represent
an incredible resource.
Course
Requirements:
The main requirement for this
class is an original piece of historical scholarship of publishable quality and
format (roughly 30 to 35 pages in length).
In order to succeed with this requirement, students MUST hand in 3
drafts of their paper, as well as preparatory written exercises described
below. All written assignments must
utilize formal prose, be typed, and handed in on time. Please note that the 2 initial drafts, as
well as the final version, should be submitted in a completed (not “rough”)
draft form, critiqued, and then returned for further polishing.
As part of promoting the
environment of collegiality essential to academic endeavors, an additional
significant part of the course will be peer reviews in which students critique
each others work. Students will write
3-4 formal critiques (approximately 1-2 pages each) and approximately 5 less
developed responses to their classmates work (precise numbers will be
determined by the final enrollment in the class). In addition, each student will deliver an oral comment on one
other student’s paper during one of the final two session. This process will be
described in greater detail in class.
The overall purpose is to assist the other student in writing a stronger
paper (and to receive the same assistance yourself). Copies of these assessments will go to both the students and the
instructor.
Class participation will
constitute the final portion of the course grade. This work entails completion of reading by the assigned date,
occasional pass/fail written assignments, attendance at class meetings, oral
presentations of one’s work-in-progress, and participation in class
discussions. By definition a seminar
requires a give and take that can happen only when people are there and
participate. Please note that
participation means not just speaking.
It means being prepared and contributing thoughtful ideas, questions, or
opinions.
As stated above, I expect both
prompt, regular attendance and that written material will be submitted on
time. If you must miss a class, there
will be a required written assignment (primarily as a way of allowing you to
engage the material). If for some
reason you do need an extension on written work (and extensions are by no means
automatic), you must arrange this in advance.
You must get the extension from me in writing and attach that to the
written work.
40% Final version of paper
20% Preliminary written exercises and (second)
draft
20%
Peer reviews
20%
Participation in class
Grading policies:
While the majority of your grade will be based on your written
work, active, constructive class participation is essential to a successful
class. Attendance will be taken and
absences will affect the participation grade accordingly.
Depending on how much your
fellow students are inconvenienced, there will be a penalty in your grade for
late assignments. Material that is
handed in after the due will generally be marked down at least a 1/3 of a
letter grade for each day it is late.
That is: a paper that would have been an A, will be an A- if it is one
day late and a C- if it is 7 days late, etc.
Days means days of the week, not class sessions.
Developing your intellectual
skills is possible only when you actually do the work assigned. We will have a longer discussion of
intellectual work, intellectual dishonesty, and plagiarism. Plagiarism and cheating will result in an
“F” for the work in question and possible disciplinary action by the
University. See the Indiana
University Academic Handbook (p. 123) or the IUPUI Campus Bulletin,
2000-2002 (p. 36) or talk with me if you have questions about what
is or is not permissible.
A grade of “incomplete” is
troublesome for everyone. The
University’s policy is that they are only for students who have completed
almost all course requirements and have been prevented by significant or
unanticipated circumstances from finishing them.
Logistics:
Information for this class will be posted on
ONCOURSE. This will include
announcements to the class, changes in the syllabus or due dates, some
handouts, etc. This is
particularly helpful when you have to miss a class. If you miss a class, you are still advised to contact a classmate
about what happened in class. I will
not be using the “chat room” or discussion features of ONCOURSE, but will use
it for e-mail and announcements. You
can also contact your classmates via class mail.
I encourage you to set your
ONCOURSE options to let you know when you have ONCOURSE mail.
I expect that all students in
this class will access ONCOURSE regularly.
Generally, I will post materials for class by Monday at 10am
Normally, I will respond to
e-mail within 48 hours (except for messages sent after 12:00 noon on Friday, to
which I may not respond until sometime late Monday).
As you may know, you are
entitled to an e-mail account through IUPUI.
I realize that many of you prefer to use another provider for e-mail and
web work. The University encourages you
to set up your IUPUI account to forward information to your other
accounts. It means that you can easily
access information from the University.
If you need help setting up the account or forwarding mail, contact:
https://iupui-accts.iupui.edu/students/student.html
I have voice mail that is on
twenty‑four hours a day. You are
welcome to call me should you need to do so.
Note, however, that I will not play “phone tag.” If you leave a phone message, speak slowly
and clearly, provide a phone number where you can be reached, and state when
you will be at that number.
FYI: There is a University web
page that will let you know if the campus is closed for snow:
http://registrar.iupui.edu/adverseweather.html
The Dean’s Office has advised me
to warn students that “ultimately, they are responsible for activity on their
computer accounts.” Be so advised.
THREE IMPORTANT
POINTS:
1. I cannot stress too heavily the usefulness of
planning ahead, saving work on your computer OFTEN, making backups, and
printing out your paper early. I will
recount suitable horror stories of people who did not take these precautions. Please do not become another one of my
instructive tales.
2. Unless it becomes necessary, I do not expect to
assign pages in Turabian, Struck and White, or Lamott. I will make the following observations.
a. Turabian (the “ruler lady” of the University of
Chicago) has an excellent index. If you
encounter a problem when citing (or someone tells you that you have a problem),
please consult her. Based on having
read students and friends works, I particularly recommend reviewing the
following sections (in the 6th edition): 2.26, 2.53-54, 2.60,
3.65-97 [on the use of commas, colons, semi-colons, and dashes], 3.106 [a MUST
READ], 4.19, 5.11. 5.16-23, 5.30-38, 9.28, chapters 8-9; and chap. 11 [“N”s and
“B”s]. PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT WE ARE
USING STANDARD HISTORICAL CITATION FORMAT---what Turabian calls N&B---NOT
PARENTHETICAL REFERENCES AND REFERENCE LISTS---referred to as PR & RL.
Turabian is limited in her advice after referring to manuscript
materials. For listing materials in a bibliography, you generally list the
collection; see 10.16 [although it suggests the form for a Reference List
entry, you can use second example in your bibliography]. You may also want to check with the
archivists of collections you use for suggestions or look at the footnotes in
the articles we read for the class.
b. You
may also find Strunk and White helpful (with the exception of Ch 5, pt. 17).
c. Be
sure to begin following the format laid out in the University’s Guide to the
Preparation of Theses and Dissertations, esp. pp. 7-9.
3. Handouts,
your copy of articles, and other reading material should be brought to class
the day/s they are being discussed.
TENTATIVE COURSE OUTLINE AND
ASSIGNMENTS
The syllabus for this course
will be on ONCOURSE. I will post
additions, corrections, handouts, and other supplemental materials there as
well announce them in class. It is the
responsibility of the student to stay on top of changes.
1/10: Introductions,
overview of course objectives, requirements, themes, and the syllabus.
Study the historian before you study the facts. -E.H.
Carr
Handout:
Brecht, “A Worker Reads
History.”
Review form
Part I.
History and Gender
1/17: WHAT
IS HISTORY?
WHO MAKES HISTORY?
WHO ARE HISTORIANS?
WHY DO WE WRITE HISTORY?
History’s great tradition is to
help us understand ourselves and our world so that each of us, individually and
in conjunction with our fellow men, can formulate relevant and reasoned
alternatives and become meaningful actors in making history. Considered in this light, History is a way
of learning.
-William Appleman Williams
Required Reading:
Brecht (handout)
Carl
Becker, “Everyman His Own History” AHR (1932) - JSTOR.
Florence Miller, “Open Letter to Salman Rushdie” (1992) - CA537
GENDER AS A CATEGORY OF
ANALYSIS IN U.S. HISTORY
Required Reading:
Joan Scott, “Gender: A Useful
Category of Historical Analysis,” AHR (1986) - JSTOR
Karen Anderson, Teaching
Gender in U.S. History (AHA 1997) - CA537
Assignments:
Be prepared to answer the
question: What is gender?
With Anderson (or Scott) in
mind, examine a relevant section of an American history textbook and be
prepared to talk about how the perspective/s she lays out would have you
rethink the history presented there in a significant way.
Be prepared to present to the
class (in less than 5 minutes) your initial plans for the topic of your paper.
Recommended Readings:
For a feminist critique of
(some) gender analysis, see:
Judith Bennett, “Feminism and
History” Gender and History (1989) - CA537
On being an academic and the
historical profession:
Gary T. Marx, “Of Methods and
Manners for Aspiring Sociologists: 37 Moral Imperatives” American
Sociologist (1997) or
http://web.mit.edu/gtmarx/www/37moral.html.
C. Wright Mills, “On Intellectual
Craftsmanship,” in his The Sociological Imagination (1959).
Peter Novick, That Noble Dream: The
“Objectivity Question” and the American Historical Profession (New York:
Cambridge University Press, 1988).
1/24: RETHINKING
HISTORY, pt. 1
We do not know yet what our past is going to be.
-Eastern European aphorism
REPUBLICANISM and VIRTUE
Required Reading:
Robert E. Shalhope, “Toward a Republican
Synthesis: the Emergence of an Understanding of Republicanism in American
Historiography” WMQ (1972) - JSTOR
Ruth H. Bloch, “The Gendered Meanings of
Virtue in Revolutionary America” Signs (1987) - CA537
NINETEENTH-CENTURY POLITICS
Required Reading:
Joel Sibley, The American
Political Nation, 1838-1893, Chapters 3 & 11 (1991) - CA537
Paula Baker, “The Domestication
of American Politics,” AHR (1984) - JSTOR
Assignment:
Go to H-NET and look at least one discussion list. Be prepared to report briefly (less than 5
minutes) on what resources were in that list and how useful them seemed.
http://www2.h‑net.msu.edu
Recommended readings:
If republicanism interests you, a more recent synthesis (or at least
historiographical essay) can be found in:
Daniel T. Rodgers, “Republicanism: the career
of a concept” JAH (1992) - JSTOR; you might ask yourself whether Rodgers
does a satisfactory job of dealing with gender in his review.
FRIDAY, 1/26: Written Assignment due (email or fax
to class).
1- to 2-page (double-spaced, typed) statement of your topic, the
historical debate you want to engage, and a list of the sources--primary and
secondary you plan to utilize.
1/31: MEN
AND RELIGION; WOMEN AND FOREIGN POLICY
Making the world is
undeniable a political act. Writing
histories that imply alternative ways in which the world might have been made
are also political acts.
-Thomas Holt
You may wish to review Anderson, “The Growth
of Fraternal Orders,” pp. 25-27.
Required Reading:
Gail Bederman, “The Women Have Had Charge of
the Church Work Long Enough” American Quarterly (1989) - JSTOR.
Susan Curtis, "The Son of
Man and God the Father” - CA537
Joan Jacobs Brumberg, “Zenanas
and Girlless Villages” JAH (1982) - JSTOR.
Discussion of
research proposals. Come with at least
one specific comment, question, or suggestion for each classmate (written out)
Part II: Research
2/7: LIBRARY,
ARCHIVAL, AND GOVERNMENT SOURCES*
No Documents, no history.
*meeting
place and time to be announced
Written Assignment:
develop and situate four potential research questions
2/14: RETHINKING
HISTORY, pt. 2
Required Reading:
A Classic Statement: Robert S. Lynd and Helen
Merrell Lynd, Middletown: a study in Modern American Culture, “Group
Solidarity” (1929) - CA537
First Revision: Leonard J. Moore, “Historical
Interpretation of the 1920's Klan: the traditional view and the populist
revision” Journal of Social History (1990) - CA537
Revision of the Revision: Kathleen M. Blee,
“Women of the 1920s’ Ku Klux Klan Movement” Feminist Studies (1991) -
CA537
Assignment: Brief oral reports of your projects.
2/21:
DEVELOPING
ARGUMENTS AND INTERPRETING PRIMARY SOURCES
Facts can be proved or disproved.
But as soon as you put two facts together you have a fiction. -Paul
E. Johnson
Required Reading:
K.A. Cuordileone, “‘Politics in an Age of
Anxiety’: Cold War Political Culture and the Crisis in American Masculinity,
1949-1960” JAH (2000) - JSTOR
TBA
Assignment: Bring in an excerpt or short
example of one of your primary sources.
2/28: No
class--work on primary and secondary sources
3/7: SOURCES,
RESEARCH PLAN, ARGUMENT, AND WRITING
Written Assignment:
An annotated
bibliography of the secondary and primary sources you are using.
3/14: SPRING
BREAK
Part III: Writing and Revising
3/21: No
class--Schedule Individual conferences
Due by 5:30 pm: Precis of
paper [to be described].
3/28: HOW
TO CRITIQUE AND REVISE.
Written Assignment:
First drafts of your paper
due. Come to class with 2 copies.
3/30, 5 pm: Last
day to withdraw from Spring 2001 courses.
4/4: GROUP
CONSULTATIONS
Due: 1-2 page critique of
members of your group (copy to them, copy to me)
4/11: GETTING
AN ARTICLE PUBLISHED
Written Assignment:
Second drafts from first half of
the class due (TBA): bring copies for all classmates and the instructor.
4/18: CLASS
PRESENTATION AND RESPONSE FOR FIRST HALF OF CLASS
DUE: formal critiques (1 for
each presenter) and 1 to 2 paragraphs from the rest of the class.
Second drafts from the second
half of class (TBA): bring copies for all classmates and the instructor.
4/25: CLASS
PRESENTATION AND RESPONSE FOR SECOND HALF OF CLASS
Conclusion and evaluation
5/2: FINAL PAPERS DUE by 5:30 p.m.